What the housing qualification standard means for your next customer hire

Katy Bevan, Founder • August 10, 2026

The Competence and Conduct Standard comes into force in October 2026. Larger providers, those with 1,000 homes or more, have until October 2029 to comply, and smaller providers until 2030. Senior housing managers will need a Level 4 qualification, and directors and heads of service a Level 5 or a foundation degree. Most associations are treating this as a job for the training team. It is also a hiring one, and it changes who you can appoint and how you write the brief.


The scope is where it bites

The standard follows what a role does, not what it is called. Anyone spending more than half their time on housing management service delivery, or where that is a substantial part of the role, is in scope. The guidance is not prescriptive, so borderline director roles sit in a grey area. A customer director covering complaints, income and contact centre could be read either way, and two associations can look at the same job and reach different answers. Decide where your role sits before you advertise it, because it changes who can do the job.


The people it falls hardest on

Housing has always been a sector you could rise through on results. Plenty of today's strongest customer leaders started on a front line, in a call centre, an income team or a housing office, and climbed on the strength of what they delivered rather than what they studied. The standard asks something specific of that group.


The entry requirements themselves are experience-based. The CIH Level 4 Certificate expects you to be working in housing at a supervisory or management level, with a Level 3 qualification or equivalent experience behind you. The Level 5 Diploma expects around two years at that level, or the Level 4 first. So there is no GCSE or A-level gate at the door, which matters.


The ask sits in the study itself. These are degree-level qualifications assessed by written assignment, and for a leader who has run a function for fifteen years and not sat a formal assessment since school, that is a real and uneven demand. It tests a credential they can earn on top of a capability they have already proven. A leader who progressed through performance can feel penalised by a rule that rewards paperwork, and that is worth naming plainly rather than waving through. When you hire, factor in that the strongest candidate on the evidence may also be the one for whom the qualification is the biggest lift, and decide how you will back them through it.

Person typing on a laptop at a wooden desk, wearing a brown sweater.

What it changes about the hire

For an in-scope role you are choosing between a leader who already holds the qualification, one who can complete it inside the transition window, and one you sponsor through it while they run the function. Each carries a different risk and a different cost in time. A director studying for a Level 5 while running a stretched function needs those hours from somewhere, so asking for a turnaround and a qualification from the same eighteen months is asking a lot of one appointment. Strong candidates will ask whether the seat is in scope, whether you will fund the qualification, and how you will protect the time. Vague answers lose the people you most want.


The spend pressure underneath it

The regulator is pressing harder on value for money, and professionalising a workforce costs both fees and hours away from the day job. That pressure lands on the customer function first, because it is where complaints and satisfaction scores are read. A leader who lifts service while showing clearly where the money goes is worth more now than the same leader was two years ago.


This is the search we run

We recruit customer leaders into housing across complaints, income, experience and operations. Before a search begins we settle whether the role is in scope, what qualification it needs, and how you will support the person to meet it, including the ones who have earned their place without a formal qualification behind them. That hour saves the awkward conversation three interviews in, when a strong candidate asks a question the brief never answered.


Quick answers


When does the standard come into force?

October 2026. Larger providers with 1,000 or more homes have until October 2029, smaller providers until 2030.


Which roles are in scope?

Roles where housing management service delivery is more than half the work, or a substantial part of it, judged by what the role does rather than its title.


Do you need GCSEs or A-levels to qualify?

No. Entry to the CIH Level 4 and Level 5 qualifications is based on housing experience at a supervisory or management level, not prior academic certificates. The qualifications are degree-level and assessed by assignment, which is the real demand on experienced leaders.


What does it mean for hiring?

Decide whether the role is in scope, whether you will fund the qualification and protect the time, and how you will back a strong candidate who is not yet qualified, before you brief the market.


Stellify. Elevating customer functions.

FAQs

  • When does the Competence and Conduct Standard come into force, and who does it apply to first?

    It comes into force in October 2026. Larger providers, those with 1,000 homes or more, have until October 2029 to comply. Smaller providers have until 2030.

  • What qualification level does a director or head of service need?

    A Level 5 qualification or a foundation degree. Senior housing managers need a Level 4.

  • Does the standard apply based on job title, or what the role actually does?

    What it does. Anyone spending more than half their time on housing management service delivery is in scope, whatever their title says. Borderline director roles sit in a grey area and need deciding before you advertise.

  • What if my strongest candidate hasn't got the qualification yet?

    The entry requirements are experience-based, so a candidate who has run a function for years can qualify for the course itself. Factor the study into the offer and back them through it. Ruling them out over paperwork would cost you the stronger candidate.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Latest Posts

Hire in the fast period. It saves you a year.

By Katy Bevan • September 15, 2026
Maximising impact; Hire new leaders in peak. Every September the same questions come up with customer leaders who experience a type of winter peak. Is the contact centre resourced. In 2026 the questions have moved on. Will the systems hold? Is the AI we put into the service layer going to help or hurt? Have we moved far enough since last peak to measure it? Peak has become a proof question. And most businesses are still hiring for it the wrong way round. The old assumption: Don't bring a senior leader in during peak. Too much noise, too late to feel the benefits. Let them start in the new year when it's calm and they'll be ready for next time. Recruit in the slow period, impact in the fast one. Sounds sensible... Yet it’s the option that easily means impact needs to wait 12 months. Measurable impact for senior leaders has shifted from 9 down to 6 months, and in some cases as little as 3 months (the benefits of fresh eyes and board backing!) so there's no longer a need for a 6 month pre-peak integration for leaders. The bigger risk is waiting 6 months for impact that can be felt in 3. A September decision: Brief the search now, gain clarity on what you need and commit to the hiring process, and you could see someone join ready to experience peak first hand and start building on impact immediately. Transformational leaders can be available on short notice and be in time to impact your business performance. One leader put it to me in an interesting way last week: the value is in being there while it's happening. The question for September: Who do you need in the customer function to be there, and actively transforming, through this peak and into the next? If you haven't hired them yet, decide now, while the pressure is visible and the learning is free. Waiting for calm moves the risk a year down the road.
Small figurine in front of a row of larger blurred figurines on a tabletop

92% of leaders say it's not about the money. But here's why it should be.

By Katy Bevan • September 3, 2026
I spend my days talking to senior people in customer functions who are working out what they do next. This is what it sounds like: "After 15 years I feel like I've hit a ceiling. It's been amazing, it's just time." "We've had too many restructures. I can't actually get anything done." "My role is becoming more office based and my commute is 90 minutes. It just isn't sustainable." "I'm not looking, but your role excited me." Step one in understanding the person behind a CV is always the same three points, in the same order. I ask every leader the same things in the same way because it keeps the assessment fair, and it means I am comparing what people tell me rather than how well they interview. Where are you now. What made you update your CV. Your role and your experience. Remit, team, business, achievements. What next. Goals, market, timelines, non-negotiables. Salary comes up in that third conversation, and 92% of the time it is followed by a but. "...but that's not the most important thing." That is the real turning point. It is where everything else we have discussed gets tested. When someone is moving for more money alone, it usually tells me we have not got to the depth of the motivators yet. People rarely upheave a whole career for a couple of grand when they are happy, and at leadership level that would surprise me. Someone who has been underpaid for years and knows it is different. That is a correction, and it is overdue. Moving for less needs the same test. If you are happy, why leave for less. A drop will solve the immediate problem, the commute, the restructures, the lack of ownership, and for a while that feels like relief. Then the other frustrations start arriving and there is less in the role to absorb them. Less money usually means less responsibility, and less responsibility shows up in ways people do not plan for. Smaller decisions. Fewer of the rooms you are used to being in. A typical version of this came up recently. A 15k drop against 90 minutes of daily commute. Personally a good trade off. In practice the role was ill suited, the remit smaller than expected, and the friction showed up in what they could own. Back on the market inside the year, with two offers on the table. Unless intentional 'taking a step back' is often a hard adjustment for a leader who is used to operating at a certain level. Most people underestimate it. Being paid under what you are worth mostly feels like being undervalued and that you are measured against things you might not have done in a while, and only rarely doesn't. Salary is a measure and it works in both directions. Right role, wrong number. Smaller job wrapped in a bigger title. The number shows you a balance before the job description does. What a business pays tells you the remit it expects and the level the job really sits at. 92% of leaders tell me it is not the most important thing. Yet, It is still the most reliable measure they have.
Presenter speaking to seated colleagues in a conference room, with a whiteboard and notes on the wall.

People ask me how's the market. The question should be who's getting jobs.

By Katy Bevan • September 3, 2026
People ask me how's the market. The question should be who's getting jobs.

FAQs

  • Does bringing AI into a customer function mean replacing the leadership?

    Usually not. It means checking that the leader can decide where AI helps and where it hurts, and lead the team through the change. Many can. Where they cannot, leaving it unaddressed is what costs you.

  • What should a board look for when hiring a customer leader 
for an AI-era function?

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

  • Why does AI in customer contact carry more risk in regulated industries?

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

  • How does Stellify approach these searches?

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. 

Hiring a customer leader?

Looking for your next role?